Originally Posted by
Lewbronski
My operating assumption is that “Teamroper” is in the employ of the company or one of the company’s consultants, is in thrall of the company, is a rando that simply is opposed to the idea of organized labor, or some combination of the four possibilities.
However, that doesn’t mean that I don’t want to try to hear our opposition’s arguments in order to be able to develop the best ideas to defeat them. I also want to hear their attacks upon our positions in order to better understand their tactics and the arguments or approaches they believe are the best ways to undermine what we’re trying to accomplish. In that respect, I think likely company operatives like “Teamroper” can be valuable.
Interesting/surprising conclusion from you. Still, you are sharp enough to not dismiss everything without consideration.
I have written more (alternate) strategies about how to potentially strengthen your bargaining position than all of the other suggestions here combined.
I’ve studied your enlightening posts. Go re-read all of my posts in this thread and tell me I’m wrong Lew. If you do that with an honestly open mind, and come to the same conclusion as above, I’ll gladly slip into the ether.
Let me know here on this thread…I’ll keep an eye out for you.