View Single Post
Old 04-04-2008 | 06:45 AM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,126
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Past V1
But if anyone has any STAT's....not rumors...on how the RJ's are unprofitable...please share

50-seat RJ's burn far more fuel per available seat than larger aircraft...ANY larger aircaft including 70 seaters.


If you have 150 pax, you can either use 3 RJ's or one 737...the 73 will burn far less fuel and cost less to buy and maintain than 3 RJ's.

The only downside to the 73 is frequency...the pax have one flight schedule per day instead of three. This is a big deal, and it was one of the driving forces bheind the rise of the RJ...but with fuel prices where they are, the airlines are not as worried about frequency.

Rough numbers (cruise):

737-7: 5,000 lbs/hour
CRJ 200: 3,000 lbs/hour

Last edited by rickair7777; 04-04-2008 at 06:54 AM.
Reply