View Single Post
Old 04-04-2008 | 09:35 AM
  #14  
maveric311's Avatar
maveric311
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: AE ERJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
50-seat RJ's burn far more fuel per available seat than larger aircraft...ANY larger aircaft including 70 seaters.


If you have 150 pax, you can either use 3 RJ's or one 737...the 73 will burn far less fuel and cost less to buy and maintain than 3 RJ's.

The only downside to the 73 is frequency...the pax have one flight schedule per day instead of three. This is a big deal, and it was one of the driving forces bheind the rise of the RJ...but with fuel prices where they are, the airlines are not as worried about frequency.

Rough numbers (cruise):

737-7: 5,000 lbs/hour
CRJ 200: 3,000 lbs/hour
another downside in the 737-7 for pax's is that it cannot serve some of the smaller airports that the RJ's currently fly to.
Reply