Originally Posted by
01110011
I don’t really get this. It’s not “fixing a company issue”, it’s making certain aspects of the job better. No amount of extra cash would get me to upgrade into reserve, but if they fixed reserve I’d happily upgrade and take the extra cash. That’s a perk for me that happens to help the company with staffing.
These are work rule, pay, benefits improvements. Unless you mean work rule, pay, and benefits improvements but only for lineholders?
Just because it benefits the company doesn’t mean it’s bad for us and vice versa. Options are good. It would be nice to make reserve more viable for people who aren’t solely motivated by money from an upgrade or WB flying. Right now we have some incredibly cushy gigs and some incredibly crummy ones. You can make the crummy ones better without making the cushy gigs suck. Reserve could be something desired, not dreaded. We could tweak it so that those that want to make money can make money being on reserve and those that want less stick time can preference not flying.
Bad reserve rules are definitely our problem. They might not be for you today, but if we find ourselves in crummy economic times down the road reserve might not “be a choice” anymore and negotiating improvements there now will pay dividends.
the point is that the company should be motivated enough to improve reserve rules without us spending negotiating capital on it.
nobody says that reserve should suck in principle. People just say that the company should fix it anyway - maybe even via an LOA. But they are holding out because they think they can get something in return