Originally Posted by
Poppachubby
If first year pay was what they are so desperate to change (the so-called leverage) then why didn't they raise first year right away on this TA? I think they are going more for retention than attracting.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding what you’re saying, but doesn’t the table show $93 and some change for first year pay? I know training pay was a joke of an increase, but looks like first year was adjusted relatively well.