Originally Posted by
Vsop
Trip I generally like your positive outlook, but to me this oversight is egregious.
We fly a lot of random routes to CDG/AMS/LHR mostly in the sooner or later retiring 7ER that could be accomplished by our partners in an NB. Those will not count against our scope with this global agreement.
On top of that I assume that our 320 category pilots would enjoy a RDU-CDG flight every once in awhile.
All this TA needs to be a win is some sort of balanced long haul NB hours clause. To me it’s a no until it is included.
I’m confused about what you’re advocating. You want to make sure narrowbody jets get some ocean crossings, and give the company credit for putting that on a route instead of the proposed requirement for widebody flying? Surely I misunderstand what you want.