Originally Posted by
TED74
As a knuckle-dragging scope ignoramus, I just wonder what’s to stop the company from violating scope with the intent to cure themselves up to a desired widebody end state? If they’re 100 WB pilots short of where they want to be in 12 months, doesn’t the defined cure give them the prescription for an easy way to get there, with all the associated benefits of some temporary surge outsourcing?
As I read the language, it works in the opposite way. The company has to staff for deficit flying using the formula in 1 X. 9. and this supersedes (and I think is >) the PBS staffing formula in 23. C.
Now lets get real: the company does not control all these partners flying. It appears to me that Glen Hauenstein has a vision for Delta flying and that vision is to at least match the sum total of global partner flying. Otherwise, management would have never agreed to this.