If they can email us a list of pairings flown with links to them, they most certainly could email folks with details about how section 25.bb.E works. Purely education regarding what the section is about and what the contractual outcome is when flights are flown voluntarily vs involuntarily. I've never received one.

I'm talking education, not condemnation. It doesn't take a lawyer to figure out that factually detailing an aspect of our contract devoid of judgement is not a legal risk.

If it is, then I'd be open to hearing an explanation of how they can send out emails detailing which pairings are disputed, then follow them up with links to the pairings flown. So that's okay, but sending out an email that outlines the process itself and shows the contractual implications of pairings flown voluntarily vs involuntarily is some sort of legal risk? I doubt it.