Originally Posted by
KnockKnock
Speaking of picking and choosing opposing realities. How do you and your fellow yes voters come to the conclusion that a company which refuses to negotiate a rate such as DAL's when such a rate exists, will give that same or very similar rate in an out of contract raise, due to facing the very industry environment, which you claim they refuse to face in the first place.
You're basically saying what I and others are saying. "The company, would have/will be, forced to acknowledge a new reality regarding CBA's". You're just saying it will happen later and outside of negotiations, while I'm saying had we waited, it would have happened sooner, during negotiations and by jumping the gun, we cost ourselves a lot of money which we cannot recoup.
I said no such thing. I said 4/5 and 5/5 new contracts signed by Sept 1 will give us a snap up this year. And Sept 1 2024 will defnitely be higher than 331 due to the snap ups. Our next payraise after that will be via a new pilot contract.
Your guess of stalling on purpose is nothing more than a look-back at the situation now that it unfolded the way it did. Amazing your side is now calling for stalling MORE as the proper answer to our negotiation strategy. On one hand, wear orange and march because the company dragged out this for years. But now you wanted the pilots to drag it out even longer. I have to live in reality today, not revisionist history of what-could-have-beens.