Originally Posted by
20Fathoms
Great catch indeed! I was actually just having this discussion with a co-pilot and we were going back and forth (he’s a no). I told him one of the reasons I went from undecided to yes was because of the 48 hr SS soak. While not perfect it’s a good limiting principle and one of the most important pieces of language in the whole TA.
And now it’s apparently not there. That’s what I get for being lazy and reading the NN and not the actual language.
Question to Viper: Did the union give you a timeline on the language fix? I’m not voting yes due to a promise on APC (not directed at you). Also does this mess up our retro? How can we have seen the language for 45 days if the language has to change?
FWIW, NN, SRH, and Scheduling Alerts are all legally binding, as they are vetted through the company. The language
absolutely should be fixed by errata, but even if something is not caught, it is still binding.
Originally Posted by
All 5 Stages
This is one of many AIP bullets that had me enthusiastic at first, only to be mildly disappointed when the sctual TA language came out.
A5S
There were people within a week of the AIP NN, myself included, who were stating this was exactly how it was supposed/intended to work, based on conversations with Reps/Negotiators. Again, the intent is to “lessen the suck”, not to pay you more. IOW, it’s a rotation construction improvement, and one of the better ones at that.