Originally Posted by
Viper25
What are everyone’s thoughts of the negotiators comments in the latest FAQ email regarding global scope?
I think most of us have our minds made up either way, so this com isn’t going to sway the vote.
To us skeptics the arguments for not including NB or Canada/Mexico don’t hold water. I still think those should have been included. Specifically their worry that including our NB would somehow lower our WB requirements just sounds like lazy negotiation to me. WB and NB could have been segregated from each other.