Originally Posted by
Bell
Required implementation changes are limited by a “no later than” clause and the company is entitled to implement changes to the optimizer early to assess staffing requirements.
Why would the company intentionally make the upcoming summer disaster be worse than it already will be? I can’t imagine they’ll do that ‘just to see.’
The timing of this thread just made me wonder whether it was a good faith question; were you ignorant of the NLT implementation or just preparing ammunition for why we all should have voted no… or are you merely
incredibly optimistic.
Personally, I think the company will wait until the bitter end to implement the best stuff, but would love to be pleasantly surprised. The reroute stuff is certainly nice to see.