Originally Posted by
king10pin02
mia and fll serve the same market, so flying mia-south to routes we already fly fll-south doesnt add new passengers it dilutes the route
Ted, or one of his lackeys, had their excuse for this on the last investor call. Basically “our market is so strong in FLL, our passengers are wanting to fly from FLL vs MIA”
Which makes sense, it’s obvious, why do MIA when you can have easy FLL. So why did they attempt to make MIA something it isn’t?
Can’t say it enough, this management team is clueless and checked out