Originally Posted by
AirlineMerc
I see what you’re saying and don’t argue it in concept, they very clearly define what a PED is…very specifically…using very specific definitions. There doesn’t seem to be any wiggle room of interpretation of what defines a Wireless Communication Device.
Again, most company policies cover that kind of thing that would get you fired, like even using your EFB tablet for taking pictures or video. But I don’t see how the FAA could go after certificate enforcement for using an electronic device under those regulations when the electronic device doesn’t fit the definition of a device that is specifically regulated.
I don't think it's clear to us mushrooms. This paragraph might very well be legal-speak for "wifi". Or could be construed that way...
(i) the term ‘‘personal wireless services’’
means commercial mobile services, unli- censed wireless services, and common car- rier wireless exchange access services;
Specifically "unlicensed wireless services".
It's entirely possible that this has already been hashed out in FCC land, you could ask their legal office for clarification (check their website first, may have already been asked and answered).