Originally Posted by
Giordano Bruno
To the guys claiming "age discrimination," how is it that 65 is "age discrimination," and 67 is not?
If you think age discrimination is, in fact, happening no, and you support anything other than no age restrictions whatsoever, you are a hypocrite in search of justification for a money grab.
How about the 23 year old ATP requirement? The 18 year old commercial requirement? The 17 year old private requirement? The 16 year old student requirement? How many retired 66 year olds today even care about the 64 year olds of today extending their career?