Originally Posted by
logic1
None of that was the point. Since you didn’t get the point, I’ll spell it out for you. A federal law that requires you to retire at a specific age, should result in getting whatever benefits that are due to you at full retirement age.
Federal law requires you to pay into it for 10 years, why pay the other 30.
Or why not start drawing after paying for ten years regardless of age if worried about age discrimination.
I wanna retire and draw SS at 35 and paid my 10 years I can’t because of age discrimination, if I were only older I could.
35 is too old to start flying in the Air Force, I would be full retirement too.
What do you think, whoever has best victim status has the most credible argument? Go get a job for 2 years.