Yup, and that is missing the point of what I was trying to say. So, I’ll try again. Regardless of how many people say it, I do not believe scope is unenforceable in extraterritorial flying. If that was the case (RLA & US labor law not applying to that flying) then the CGN pilots and 76 guys flying Europe point to point in the EU could strike under EU laws, right?? Same with strictly APAC flying.

The company cannot have their cake and eat it too. They either abide by the RLA in ALL flying (including extraterritorial flying) or that particular flying (extraterritorial flying) is covered by the country’s laws in which it occurs. It cannot be either/or at the whims of the Company.

Our CBA is in effect regardless of where we operate. So why is it that people keep saying Section 1 of our contract is unenforceable, when every other section is enforceable??

Lastly, I’ve read Secrion 1 more than once. I encourage everyone to take 5mins and read our international scope. 1 paragraph. Pretty easy reading. The company CAN do whatever they want to move freight between intl and intl cities. This needs to be changed and changed now