Originally Posted by
DeltaboundRedux
Missed the faux news award update. Justice reigns, I guess.
One could quite easily argue that the aggrieved party didn't trust the jury either. Their original damages request was $1.6 billion.
Presumably it was a straightforward civil damages case. The compensatory damages sought would've needed some paperwork to prove.
So the winner in this case was deprived a huge amount, but they took it because juries are a complete gamble. That's a problem.
Did fox lie or not? Curious for your thoughts on this