View Single Post
Old 04-24-2023 | 07:27 AM
  #162  
Linepilot63
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 113
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by ECCVref20
It's mind boggling why we have FedEx pilots (specifically the 3-4 characters on these threads) going all out trying to rationalize sub-industry standard language in our Scope section when Raj and Co. have publicly and repeatedly said that they WILL outsource wherever they can to line the pockets of DE Shaw and themselves (during DRIVE announcement, it was announced executive bonuses would be tied more directly to stock performance).

Making reference to Eastern, Pan-am, Braniff, etc in an attempt to brush away the importance of scope language, to me, shows that there is a serious lack of understanding (or intentional attempt at distraction?) of what Scope actually is intended for. Those airlines failing had nothing to do with outsourcing and everything to do with deregulation and raiders like Frank Lorenzo and Carl Icahn who destroyed families and lives with their greed. To bring Scope into that discussion is literally comparing apples to grapefruits...

The "shut up and color" or "give something to get something" mentality needs to go the way of the 727.

Got Scope?
Why: A no vote stands in the way of the new Section 28.

Well said.

Going to go and shut up and color now.

Got scope?
Reply