Originally Posted by Prospect

You dare call into question the great Lewbronski? Stand by for a thesis with 15 ad hominem attacks implying you're a corporate plant or too inexperienced to know anything, 10 more straw men arguments, and several accusations that it is you and not he who is using all the logical fallacies. He'll throw in a bunch of data that is completely irrelevant to make his point. His gaggle of fan bois will follow suit with short one liners that make no sense.