Originally Posted by
Rooster435
There’s No loop hole it’s pretty clear in the new contract as it was in the old, Go read 23.M.7
Leaves it up to “scheduler judgement.”
I think the only argument we have is that the company isn’t pay protecting the passed over pilot without being prodded.
Are there any changes to 23.M.7 between this contract and the last one? Because as far as far as I understand there weren't any. So this premise then that what's causing the IA abuse is the new contract is incorrect correlation. So, my point to JB and Puddy: you made the claim, now present the evidence.