Originally Posted by
Venkman
I don't think your points are necessarily wrong, but I look at it this way - you're arguing "why shouldn't we?"when the real argument is "why should we?" Who benefits? Senior pilots (financially) and the company's who would go to the ends of the earth to avoid sweetening labor contracts.
I think management and those in favor will argue the traveling public benefits from fewer cancelled flights, and fewer airports losing service. That alone is a winning argument for Congress