I fixed it for you until you want to expand on the multitude of blatant lies that you claim are coming from union leadership. You are the one who claimed a pattern of dishonesty. Multiple people have asked to see that pattern. Regardless of whether or not your singular example is a smoking gun, a single example is not indicative of a pattern. You can continue to double down on your example, or you can engage in educating us as to how union leadership is telling us many blatant lies.

You've also been asked to point us to the claimed retracted by the union. Nothing. If this is the example you're going to double down on, why not provide the location of the retraction? Nobody has said your example was false, but there certainly isn't consensus that it represents an intentional lie by union leadership. Maybe if you point us to the retraction, you might get some more people on your side.