Originally Posted by
rickair7777
Yes, given the language in the HR as it stands it has serious cluster potential because of that issue, with no specific legislative guardrails.
But temporary since ICAO would almost certainly follow along in short order.
you think? I was under the impression ICAO wanted nothing to do with 67
it would be interesting if the likes of AA, UA, DL and other airlines that are generally opposed to 67 along with ALPA were able to lobby to exempt carriers engaged in flag operations outside of US and Canada*. Basically allowing 67 at the regionals while keeping 65 at the majors.
* it is my understanding Canada already does not have an age limit, which is why I made that distinction