Originally Posted by
Excargodog
Not bickering at all and I actually like Bluedriver. I’d just like him to expand his retinue of things he might CONSIDER like I think he has done with DTZ which at one time he was adamantly opposed to but as he became better acquainted with it through the give and take on here he came to better appreciate.
But we all sit in hotels sometimes and it would be advantageous for us ALL to give serious considerations for what we want and what the possibilities are for the JCBA. We may be living under that JCBA for half a decade. The MEC and the NC can’t do all the thinking for us.
I appreciate that man. One of the few virtues I aspire to, is to still be able to recognize my initial bias's, change my opinion, and adopt a new or different idea. Sounds like you guys are pulling that off.
Sounds like you and I may walked the sidewalk together with the corny signs, and I just hope the combined group has the stones to demand nothing less than DAL/UAL parity or shut the whole M'Fer down again.
I also agree it's all in the details, so it's going to back a lot of back and forth, so my lazy @ss is grateful for guys like you two who are bright enough to have these discussions.
My concern is the very new guys will be dazzled by the old shiney jet syndrome and an "adequate" agreement. After all, even a crap agreement beats a recent CFI gig, and I'm afraid they'll fall for it.