Originally Posted by
rekatron
If this thing passes, I seriously doubt ICAO will just immediately follow in lockstep like everyone seems to arrogantly think they will. We ****ed away a lot of that clout with the MAX debacle. A change would require a very hard diplomatic push from the Biden Administration, plus most international carriers aren't pushing for this, neither are other countries. ICAO member states aren't exactly breaking their neck in a rush to appease reps from backwater flyover states in rural America without the approval of POTUS.
I don't think you understand ICAO. They are not some omnipotent world government entity, they represent the member states and the US accounts for almost half of global business. They can allow 67 year olds to fly in other countries without impacting the age limits those countries set for their own pilots. Various countries have age limits for their own pilots between 60-62 on the low end all the way to no limit on the high end.
So member states can continue to do what they want, as they have already been doing for years, with some states allowing ICAO pilots to operate at a higher age limit within their airspace than their own pilots can.
The path of least resistance for the ICAO bureauracry would be to raise it to 67 to avoid a hot mess for their most significant member. If enough other member states protested vehemently, then it could become contentious.
Think of ICAO not as city hall but rather the board of a condo HOA... and the US is a rental corporation which owns half of the units in the building.