Originally Posted by
rickair7777
He would probably argue that he "consulted" with his brother, who's an experienced aviation professional. Elected reps can talk to people.
But for all we know his brother told him to keep it at 65, and he only went on record as a sponsor because he's on the committee. No way to know. Well I guess we'll know eventually, when/if his brother retires before age 65.
I actually have less issue with elected reps consulting citizens, friends, and family, as opposed to lobbyists who clearly have a bought and paid for agenda.
You are right, no one really knows what's in Nehl's head. But did he consult aviation medical professionals, airline finance experts, ALPA, NTSB, FAA, etc. before coming to a logical, thoughtful conclusion that Age 67 was going to "fix" whatever perceived problem we have today? Or did just talk to his brother?