View Single Post
Old 07-21-2023 | 09:55 AM
  #510  
DownSideUp
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
From: Upside Down
Cool

Originally Posted by Andy
Ace, how do you think that a pilot age extension to help alleviate the shortage plays with the general (as in voting) public?
Even if you make a cronyism charge against him, it's more likely to net Nehls votes than lose votes. You need to get out of your bubble.

The introduction of bills in the 117th Congress to raise pilot retirement age was to lay the groundwork to add this as an amendment to the 2023 FAA Reauthorization Act. I realize most don't follow how the sausage is made in DC, but this is normal inside the beltway stuff. The current shortage of qualified airline pilots all but assured that it would be attached to the Reauthorization Bill.

I'm still waiting to read Sen Duckworth's Experienced Pilots Save Lives Act which will almost certainly be attached to the Senate's version of the FAA Reauthorization Act when it leaves the Aviation, Safety, Operations, and Innovation Subcommittee which is chaired by Duckworth. She has stated that it will extend pilot retirement age to 67 but slightly raise ATP minimums - still waiting to see that, but she'll need to make some concessions to Sinema who is the swing vote on the subcommittee.
I’ve worked on the Hill as well (probably similar pedigrees). Politically, there’s no reason NOT to increase the age to 67. I believe that’s what we saw with the House vote. Politicians want to show their constituents that they are solving problems.

All the bloviating in the world from pilots wont change Washington politics.

You get it, I get it. Unfortunately, Ace don’t get it.
Reply