View Single Post
Old 07-22-2023 | 10:30 AM
  #9  
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
Laughing_Jakal
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Aquasport
I get that. But that per pilot number is not correct when considering all of the givebacks. The formula should be, Company per pilot expenditure - Company per pilot cost savings = Actual Per pilot gain. It’s seems pretty simple except for the fact that we have no number to input for the company per pilot cost savings. We all know it’s not zero. Not even factoring in the back pay. Can someone please share the the company per pilot cost savings. Just the fact that the company wants 100 percent vacation buy back will be devastating. Already 700 to 800 pilots over without that. Who thinks 25 percent of the crew force won’t sell back 75 percent of their vaca back. Say goodbye to draft. Say goodbye to hiring in the 5 years or more. Say goodbye to any movement. Guess how many pilots we will be over after this is instituted ?

for the record, I do care about our pilot group, I don’t give a rats ass what a Delta guy thinks about the contract…my comment was in response to the statement that you were AFRAID you’d be a laughing stock among other pilots…sounds insecure. It is ridiculous to say the per pilot expenditure is reduced by their cost savings, because that does not come out of your pockets….what do you care if the company finds an efficiency…if they went to a fleet of electric vehicles, would you be entitled to some of the savings?

Again the name calling and vitriol…you guys are trying to turn it into a class war. Because you won’t engage in reasonable debate, without ugly accusations is the precise reason a lot of folks won’t cast their lot with you.
Reply