Originally Posted by
EwrRocks
The retro part of it is unprecedented and the absolutely worst part of this bad idea. I have no idea how company and union would do that if they all came back at old seniority. TK would be a complete mess for a number of years.
Also, is this really an age 68 rule? Can continue for 1 day short of 68, so more like 3 year extension?
No. The language in the HR is very clearly modifies the current law by literally changing "65" to "67". Google the HR on the house website. Not an easy read but if you pull the threads it's crystal clear.