Originally Posted by
EwrRocks
The retro part of it is unprecedented and the absolutely worst part of this bad idea. I have no idea how company and union would do that if they all came back at old seniority. TK would be a complete mess for a number of years.
Also, is this really an age 68 rule? Can continue for 1 day short of 68, so more like 3 year extension?
Which is why it's the airline companies that should be fighting this provision. Not the union. If 67 goes through, I wouldn't categorize lobbying out retro as a win, or a negotiated compromise, for ALPA. That'd be a win for the companies. On ALPA's lobbying dime.