Originally Posted by
CVG767A
It seems to me that if there's still "whining" after 22 years, the arbitrator did a lousy job of merging your lists.
Do you really mean that the success of an arbitration is best defined by whether or not there is "whining" 22 years later? We'll all have to admonish the arbitrator that we will consider him a failure if there ends up being any future complaining.
By the way, was the Pan Am and Western integration done by an arbitrator, or was it just agreed to by the parties given that Pan Am and Western were on bankruptcy's doorstep? It's been so long I've forgotten.
Carl