Originally Posted by
CRJphlyer
Not sure why a bunch of professional pilots would support increasing the mandatory retirement age to 67 with 0 data or science backing up the seemingly arbitrary decision.
I'll play devil's advocate with you.
Age 60 was arbitrary. Age 65 was arbitrary. Age 67 is also arbitrary. Where's
your "data or science" (as though those are highly regarded or at all reliable in a highly politicized post-Covid world...) that supports any given fixed retirement age at all?