Thread: 23.M.7 Updated
View Single Post
Old 07-30-2023 | 06:56 AM
  #257  
crewdawg's Avatar
crewdawg
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 347
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
The problem with your argument is that M7 only comes into play when they intentionally skip a step in coverage.

What you’re describing is a an award error or omission. The scheduler and/or supervisor were in error calling this an M7 use (a lot of things are called M7 that actually aren’t) and for them to do so actually jeopardizes the company’s settlement agreement. That phone call will be listened to by the scheduling committee, and I suspect this will be on the Company’s desk at 0800 Monday morning.

It stopped being an omission when the scheduler just said we'll push it to 23M7 for processing (28 hours out) and argued with the pilot when he mentioned the contract allows for fixes up to 2 hours prior. If he hadn't called and then stood his ground, this would have stayed. Zero trust that they'll do what they agreed to.
Reply