View Single Post
Old 08-01-2023 | 08:07 AM
  #103  
Easyflier301
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 299
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
O, I see. I thought the split duty addition was going to cut down on longer trips? What about our "industry leading(no, Alaska)" pairing construction?

With split duty and pairing construction aren't we protected from longer trips? If yes how would the 10 hour rig create longer trips?.
Great question for the road shows. This is what was relayed last night on the PHL/BOS/LGA town hall. None of us were at the table, so we are just speculating at this point. My understanding is that yes, split duty was a give that APA gave anticipating some pilots would like them and bid for them in order to get AA to lock in trip construction limits. Who knows how that discussion played out when it came time to talk about 10 hour FDP.

My point is, DAL doesn’t have the trip construction limits that we have proposed in our TA. That’s a fact. So the company (and optimizer) has a lot more leeway to get productivity when the 10 hour day goes into effect.

APAs position (again, per the townhall) was that the company said at the negotiating table “you want DAL/UAL language? Fine, then you need all of it.” It’s probably safe to assume that meant eliminating the trip construction limits they had already locked in. APA wasn’t willing to go there on some things…this being one, and reserve days off /85 hour cap being another.

For better or for worse, the road shows will provide context to why things were negotiated the way they were. Until then, we are mostly just guessing.
Reply