Originally Posted by
CBreezy
No. An appropriate analogy is a JS gets your clearance for you while you were doing your walkaround and hands it to you when you get back. That's what Oaknotes does.
Not even close to analogous.
Originally Posted by
Herkflyr
…To borrow from your (flawed) analogy, it would more accurately be like the other pilot printing out the ACARS PDC, then handwriting the same clearance on the other side of the paper, but in a more "user friendly" format. If for some reason in this example, you preferred the handwritten transcription, what's the problem--so long as you verified that it contained the same info as the official PDC printed on the other side?
This is a much, much better analogy. But again, it’s moot.
Originally Posted by
OOfff
Mission+ is fine. It’s not great, but it’s also not worth the complaints. Y’all sound ridiculous
I’d agree with the first part. We will all get used to it in time, and it
will be fine. But the complaints do have merit, and are the only reason there is a 60ish item list of fixes at all. It’s
super clunky to use in its current form, as evidenced by the uproar over Oaknotes in the first place (which I didn’t even use).
Honestly, the thing that is irritating the most is the
ridiculously long lead time to get the “fixes” fielded.