Originally Posted by
CBreezy
I'm not defending M+. It had serious shortcomings. I'm just saying why I think Delta lawyers don't like it. And that's because exactly what you say. A team of people are supposed to QC M+ when changes are made before it's released to the pilots to ensure M+ is displaying the correct information. Delta has no control over Oaknotes which, whether we like it or not, is a liability to them.
Your points are valid. In theory, the M+ QC process should make it more robust, but this has not been the case. Oak Notes is not the solution. However, the html flight plan and Oak Notes represent standards of usability and features that M+ has failed to meet.