Not buying it.
Clearly, English is your second language. It appears, as noted above, that you designed your own web site. Unless you're pitching it to people who speak whatever your primary language is (Spanish or French, perhaps?), then your target audience should probably be the students you hope to garner; if the intended student base of your company are those with English as a second language, then you should probably include other languages as choices for viewing the site. If you intend native English speakers, then you really need to fix that web site. The punctuation, the language, and the grammar sound like it was written by a seventh grade Jr. High drop-out.
Your web site states "Be a Better Pilot, Fly Aircraft in a Professional Way," and yet features incomplete sentences, incorrect English, and incorrect math on the flight training costs. Your "contact us" email is a gmail. account. It looks like one guy has put a web site together for himself to pick up students, and named it after his first name. A gmail account? Hard to get cheaper than that. At a minimum, get someone who does have English as a primary language, to fix the web site. There are literally hundreds of millions of people from whom you can choose.
You appear to be renting two Cessna 172's, but have a picture of a Cirrus with the BRS CAPS parachute deployed, and the statement, "
For Absolute 100% Safety, Our Fleet Installed BRS Parachute System. Even We Lost Wings, Our Aircraft Still Fly, With Parachute Mount on Airframe, Everyone Safe Landed."
You do not need to capitalize every word in every sentence. Are you suggesting that you installed BRS parachutes on your two Cessna 172's? The phraseology sounds like you had a parachute deployment after losing a wing. Is this the case? If not, you should probably fix the web site. It sounds like you are saying that without wings, the airplane will fly (it will not). You should probably fix the web site. It sounds like you state that your airraft lost wings, but everyone landed safely. The BRS system comes with a warning that deployment will result in destruction of the aircraft and may result in injury or death, and anyone who knows anything about the BRS system knows that the moment the system is deployed, the aircraft is done flying and is only descending in an unairworthy condition under canopy, assuming that the system works. You really need someone to review, and fix that web site.
Ouch.
Do you really have a "100% Checkride Pass Rate?" That's out of "
Thousands of Hours Flight Instruction Experience?" If so, an enviable success rate, but one that is deserving of a more professional web site. And something other than a .gmail. business address. Seriously. Pay for a proper address or domain.
You advertise a "-$61,000 Saving on Training Cost Than Others." That's a negative number. Technically, a negative savings is a cost, which means, as it's written, that you cost $61,000 more than others, though the language is incorrect and confusing, and makes one wonder if you mean that all your students added together have saved that much cumulatively, or perhaps some other means.
I appreciate that your students like your lectures, but fix your web site. Especially as you're advertising it on this site.
Originally Posted by
idontknoworcare
Forget about the OP's crappy flight school. Take a look at alphaaero who is pushing a zero carbon agenda. are you going to fly electric tesla planes that require carbon to produce? will the x/c be limited to 300 miles for the next plug? you realize you are a carbon based life form and you would literally have to kill yourself to achieve carbon zero with cant be achieved anyways. whos the libtard that works there who is she is she in hr? whats her name? jfc.
"Libtard?"
Nothing says one has "redneck dumbass" tattooed across his forehead more than using that in a sentence.
If you're going to pretend to be a professional, try to act like one.