Originally Posted by
89Pistons
The push to rush through this part of the process by some makes me suspicious. It's a bad look. Bad vibe.
They voted on bullet points. Broad ideas. Without the benefit of final language. A vote for an AIP and a vote for a TA are not required to be the same. Otherwise, why vote again? I know many want to hurry up and get this over with but this part of the process is necessary. Governed by the policy manual. The language has to be vetted and the reps just got the final language on the same day we did.
I'm sure this will get past the MEC and will end up going to ratification. Everyone will have their chance to vote. But it's way too early to threaten a recall if a rep reads the final language and sees too many easter eggs. I know many want to get their hands on their retro check but relax and let this play out. We've had the language for less than a week. Chill.
If your MEC voted on bullet points they were truly doing a terrible job. The MEC should have been in near constant communication with the NC throughout the process. They should have been getting weekly updates and have been providing direction to the NC on a ongoing basis.