Originally Posted by
roogs25
why would it get struck down? The new contract, per the FACT team and alpa lawyers, allows the company to impose medical procedures on pilots provided alpa and/or the faa also agree to them. There is no restriction spelled out in the contract. Do you really trust the company, alpa, and the faa that much?
In terms of castration...yes lol. And if ALPA/FAA somehow agreed with it, just imagine how a court case would go where someone has been fired for not agreeing to something like this.
It's good to be pessimistic with regards to possible interpretation of contract language, but mentioning such extreme examples is counterproductive as they are easy to dismiss and detract from real issues. Meanwhile, mandatory vaccinations, and other realistic issues, are not discussed.