Originally Posted by
Huck
Those people in the middle had their years compressed in the pay increases to counter this.
Oh and maybe you'll be furloughed before we get to TA2.0. So there.
lol a 3 year compress does not counter that.
the pay compression to industry standard was PM's response to his scope blunder.
Originally Posted by
TomAce
My quick math says you'd have to make almost $450k a year to only see a 15% contribution. Which good for you if that's the case.
There's a ton of different opinions on retirement. I'd love a higher % contribution. But I'd like higher pay and less QOL concessions more. I also don't love the pension. I don't trust it after seeing what's happened in our industry and to some family friends. I'd rather have money in my own accounts. I know a lot of people think differently, and I understand their reasons.
Whenever we finally get a ratifiable TA, that would put most of our WB CAs at $450k/year.... to have them only getting 15% in lieu of a pension when right now they're getting 9% and a pension is not acceptable.