Originally Posted by
TheBear
Honestly, who cares where they fly? As long the company is raking in cash and the pilots are getting fairly compensated. No dog in this fight btw.
I love SEA-GEG. But I do want a management that can see beyond that because we were, before this announcement, in serious danger of becoming incapable of competing anywhere outside of the PNW.
Originally Posted by
Carebear
If those widebodies go GEG-SEA-NRT and are full, is that a bad thing? If you can sell 4500 seats a day with 20 departures from one city and make a profit, who cares? United would fly their 787 from IAD-ORD, or ORD to HOU and their 747 from SFO to DEN. You’ll probably see widebodies flying from SEA-PDX too. As long as your paycheck clears every week and you’re paid industry rates, then they can buy Metroliners and operate them from SEA-FLL for all I care.
That’s precisely what I did not say. GEG-SEA-NRT is awesome.
Originally Posted by
ShyGuy
Some people (unfortunately, seemingly ex-VX on APC) are still POed about the 2016 merger and subsequent results. Hence the widebody GEG-SEA comments. There's no logic behind that statement. Who cares? Delta flew 767s from ATL to JAX. There is no problem as long as you're compensated appropriately.
Another guy that can’t read context. See above comments, if you can understand those?