Originally Posted by
Hoosier Daddy
I'm genuinely curious, at what point in a pilot's career does it switch from good stagnation to bad stagnation? Does this only benefit current WBAs and hurt everybody else? Why?
I don't get the rabid opposition to this. Unless you had a personal hard stop at 65 or haven't been hired yet, age 67 simply gives all pilots the opportunity to work longer.
It comes down to a philosophy on work/life balance. Do you want to work longer and therefore have more dollars in your account? Or do you want to work less years and have the years you do work have a better seniority - and all that goes along with it? Also if you have/ had a plan to work to 65 or ANY AGE YOUNGER than 65 then 67 is a net loss for you.