Let me reply by saying it doesn’t matter what any of us think on 65 vs 67. The point of my posts is that we have a system that requires age 65 as the cutoff - changing that results in a net loss for anyone who wants to continue in that paradigm. The only real winners are at the top of the food chain when it happens. Mostly a net loss of QOL for everyone else. So explain to me your comment of “Their decision to do that should not have consequences for those senior to them.”. How is my deciding to retire at 65 or earlier a loss for someone senior to me? As I have said I (and other pilots) have no effect on the law change.