Thread: New Bases?
View Single Post
Old 12-20-2023 | 03:49 PM
  #14  
Excargodog's Avatar
Excargodog
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 238
Default

Originally Posted by Brickfire
Not incorrect.

But at some scale, it make sense to avoid paying for X thousand hotel nights/year. And to have reserve coverage for all those AM departures. IDK what scale that is - I suspect for narrowbodies it's north of a dozen airplanes staying overnight. Which would mean something like a 5:30 and a 7:30 to every hub. Not many candidates ... the list of large airports/cities that are not already UA bases is Dallas, Philly, Atlanta, Phoenix, Boston, Detroit, Seattle, Minneapolis. Cities that aren't somebodies hub are the St. Louis, Nashville, New Orleans, Portland range. I agree none of those places make sense if you can grow your current bases. Question is how much growth can current bases support and how much it costs to open an outstation.
Wouldn't count on Seattle. United HAD a base there for decades, but Alaska and Delta sort of shouldered them out.

https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...20of%20Seattle.
Reply