Thread: TA discussion
View Single Post
Old 12-25-2023 | 08:52 AM
  #386  
flyguy81
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 276
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
For the umpteenth time, labor unions ARE NOT constrained by the pilot group's, the company's, or the mediator's perception of "industry standard." The RLA does not require us to demand rates or any other contractual items that are within X percent or within any other parameter of whatever anyone considers industry standard. That is a myth that harms us as a labor group negotiating under the RLA. You are perpetuating that myth with posts like this.

Like folks from other airlines have pointed out, you are trying to lay the blame for SWAPA failing to attain truly industry-leading rates or retro and various other items on the likes of Delta and Alaska. We are not bound by what they agreed to. Nowhere in the RLA or the RLA case law does such a requirement exist. If we vote to ratify a contract containing substandard terms, that is entirely and 100% on us. We can't point the finger at anyone else. We have the ability to raise the bar.

You can believe the reality that the courts who interpret the RLA have published in black and white about the way the RLA is actually applied in real life or you can put your faith in stories and "stuff" and rumors and opinions you have heard from who knows what sources with who knows what intentions.

Correct but the path to the pot of gold is easier when you don’t have to do the heavy lifting yourself. Sure, we can vote it down and spend the next 1-2 years working though the RLA….but I don’t know of any pilot group with the stomach to turn down $500k/yr for the chance to make $550k. I don’t think we’re leaving much on the table to go back and fight for. 757 pay is $325/tfp and we’re at $320/tfp with the MBCBP. They won’t ever pay us 100% back pay and $1.3B is a lot of retro to thumb your nose at.
Reply