Originally Posted by
DLax85
No one is insulting you - just challenging your motivation and goals. They never seem to be "pro Fedex pilot'. They seem to be supporting the status quo and don't offer any new solutions. TA 1.0 failed. Let's listen to the junior guys and learn.
VR,
DLax
So the following isn't insulting, only constructive?
Originally Posted by
DLax85
Is this “double edge sword” sharp on either side, or dull on both? …like yours always seems to be.
.....
I post to present data, information & some insight, and to hopefully promote useful discussion & debate. Useful meaning an actual position or solution is ultimately articulated.
Your motivation and goals appear different.
VR,
DLax
Just because I disagree with your methods doesn't mean I am for the status quo. I have asked numerous times what your solutions are, but you never provide them.
Originally Posted by
DLax85
OK. I’ll rephrase. Let’s listen to the majority of the guys who voted against TA1.0 and learn. Meeting their goals is what will get us to a ratified TA - many, if not the majority, of them are junior. Hopefully, we’re aiming for a TA2.0 that’s approved by at least 70-75%, not 50%+1. The next 4 months will be interesting. Let’s all hope they’re productive.
In Transparency, Integrity and Unity (for Everyone),
DLax
p.s. It’s a simple stance. No jet / No seat should be underpaid. It’s attainable in many ways.
How about listening to EVERYONE, not just a select group. Listening to the majority of 57% of the crew force, or less than 30%, won't get us to the 70-75% approval you said you are looking for. I would like to see an even higher approval rate.