View Single Post
Old 02-06-2024, 11:39 AM
  #7  
khergan
Line Holder
 
khergan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Pinseekr9 View Post
It’s not necessarily a shrinking, more likely the company wants to avoid secondary vacancies as they see a temporary reduction in need compared to other bases. The Min/Max bulletins shows exactly where these are focused- it looks like they’re even bolded. This happens across the board throughout vacancy season and before you know it they’ll offer 50 vacancies. Not something to get too spun up about in the short term. 15/280 is very minor.

Edit to add: look at DEN787FO; 118 down to 98. That’s fairly more significant.
Interesting, thanks for your perspective. The DEN 787FO thing is similarly concerning. I guess what I was initially trying to get at is that they're shrinking BES categories without saying anything. 10-15 at a time isn't huge but if they keep doing it, before you know it, it will make a meaningful impact on people's QoL and seniority. All this can happen without displacement bids if they chip away at it.

I wish they'd post a Flight Ops briefing on what their intent is for each of the bases so we all had a better idea of what's actually going on.
khergan is offline