Originally Posted by 13n144e

"You guys". Believe it or not, not everyone with a differing viewpoint of this issue from you is a card-carrying member of LEPF and don't all have the same arguments for it. Despite your stupid assumptions, you know nothing about me or why I think 67 might be a fair proposition. And I could care less what you think of the pilot shortage or frankly what you think about any other aspect because I can accept that at this point it's completely out of our control. Apparently you can't. While I won't lose sleep over this either way I am still very interested in the outcome and I'll continue to post the occasional bit of factual information about the process because that's what interests me. You can keep crying about it but I'm just not interested in engaging in your need to constantly bicker and whine about something that we no longer have any influence over. And probably never did.


Again;

https://www.politico.com/newsletters...onths-00144587

"Leaders in the House and Senate are projecting confidence that this will be the last extension needed to enact the full FAA reauthorization, combining the Senate bill, S. 1939 (118), with the House bill, H.R. 3935 (118)."

"Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has told transportation leaders that the FAA reauthorization will get exactly one shot at floor time...So when the Commerce Committee-passed bill comes to the floor, it needs to already be synced with the House version."

"Staffers on both sides of the aisle and both ends of the Capitol are working hard to reconcile the differences between the two bills on things like pilot retirement age and the number of flights in and out of the airport most convenient to the Capitol."