Originally Posted by
rickair7777
The guy's own lawyers said that he was happy and upbeat the day before.
And yet the subjects own brother said the subject suffered from PTSD and anxiety attacks.
Originally Posted by
PNWFlyer
The guy was under the impression that Boeing was an airline, not a manufacturer.
The subject, who had worked for Boeing for three decades, in quality control, didn't know that Boeing is a manufacturer? He was misguided after thirty years and thought he worked for an airline?
You're sure about that?
Originally Posted by
Nordhavn
Sorry. Boeing would never do anything bad. They are an altruistic company which puts safety above all else. They don't have any friends on capital hill to help their troubles disappear. Do you think Pfizer is here for public health too? You need a red pill brother. WTFU!
Without evidence, you've managed to roll a littany of fallacies and irrelevance into one post and provide absolutely nothing of substance. Pfizer is irrelevant, but between your straw man and red herrings, what has altruism got to do with the price of tea in China? Conspiracy minded claptrap without evidence doesn't count for much.
Originally Posted by
AntiCompanyMan
Part of me wonders if the whistleblower had already spoken of all the skeletons in the closet at Boeing, and decided the only way to heighten suspicions was to kill himself the day before his deposition, provoking the kind of public discussions that we are currently seeing. Almost as if he decided his suicide would be more impactful at pressuring Boeing to change things than sitting through yet another deposition, which he had been doing for years with minimal consequences to Boeing.
Part of you wonders about that? Which part?
Have it removed. Just when one thought the conspiracy bull **** couldn't get any deeper, here it is. Idiotic. He killed himself to provoke public discussion? Now there's some self-sacrifice.